Academic House Style and Acknowledgement Writing: the Case of Two Ghanaian Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv11i211658Keywords:
academic house style, discourse community, genre analysis, thesis acknowledgementAbstract
This descriptive study sought to examine the structural features of Thesis Acknowledgements (TA) from two disciplines in two Ghanaian Universities. Forty TAs were sampled from the fields of Chemistry and English. Hyland’s (2004) generic move structure was modified in analyzing the sampled TAs. The data was also examined on the basis of the two institutions’ academic style guides for conformity. The findings indicate that the structural features of TAs from the two fields differ. It also revealed that out of the seven steps identified in the obligatory Elaborative Move, DoC writers generally use three steps, and DoE writers mostly use four steps. It is further revealed that while writers from the DoC mostly acknowledged contributors for their technical support, writers from DoE acknowledged their helpers for providing materials for the research. It was revealed that the data followed the institutional style guide. The paper argues that though the contextual difference in the TAs from both fields is minimal, subtle variances and parallels still exist between the two fields. Therefore, it is suggested that these variations in linguistic forms that account for the discursive styles of the TAs should be further examined. Finally, additional analysis by corpus analytic tools applied to large data from the research context could complement this study.
Downloads
References
Afful, J. B. A. (2016). A genre study of undergraduate dissertation acknowledgements in a ghanaian university. ESP Today, 4(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2016.4.2.4
Al-Ali, M. N. (2006). Conveying academic and social identity in graduate dissertation acknowledgements. in C Nuemann, R. P. Alastrue',& C. P. Auri'a (Eds.). Procedings of the Fifth International AELFE Conference (pp. 35-42). Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
Al-Ali, M. N. (2010). Generic patterns and socio-cultural resources in acknowledgements accompanying Arabic Ph.D. dissertations. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 20(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.1.01ali
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Back cover blurbs: Puff pieces and windows on cultural values. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation. Review genres in university settings (pp. 68–83).
Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicist Reading Physics: Schema-Laden Purposes and Purpose Laden Schema. Written Communication, 2, 23–24.
Benjamin, J., Afful, A., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2012). Sub-disciplinary variation and rhetoric in dissertation acknowledgements written by education students: The case of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256706392_Sub-disciplinary_Variation_and_Rhetoric_in_Dissertation_Acknowledgements_Written_by_Education_Students_The_Case_of_the_University_of_Cape_Coast_Ghana?ev=prf_pub
Benjamin, J., Afful, A., & , Awoonor-Aziaku, L. (2017). Naming in Master's Thesis acknowledgements within Two Ghanaian University Departments. Journal of Pan African Studies (Online), 10(9), 252273. https: //www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/naming-master's-thesis-acknowledgements-withingtwo/docview/1958616728/se2?accoundtid=25704
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Hillsdale.
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: Analytical advances and pedagogical procedures. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., 279–284.
Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Temple University Press.
Bruce, I. (2010). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. Data Standars Ltd.
Cheng, S. W. & Kuo, C. W. (2011). A pragmatic analysis of MA thesis acknowledgements. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(3), 29–58.
Cheng, S. W. (2012). A contrastive study of master thesis acknowledgements by Taiwanese and North American students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(1), 8–17.
Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1994). The Scholar’s Courtesy: a Survey of Acknowledgement Behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 50(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026929
Freed, R. C. & Broadhead, G. J. (1987). Discourse communities, sacred texts and institutional norms. College Composition and Communication, 38, 15–165.
Ghana, U. of. (2014). Handbook for Masters’ Degree Programmes and Regulations Governing Graduate Study and University Examinations School. Accra: University Press.
Giannoni, D. S. (2002). Worlds of Gratitude: A Contrastive Study of Acknowledgement Texts in English and Italian Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.1
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes. 23(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889- 4906(03)00051-6
Hyland, K. (2003). Dissertation Acknowledgements. Written Communication, 20(3), 242–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303257276
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00051-6
Kuo, L. (2018). A pragmatic analysis of MA thesis acknowledgements. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(3).
Mohsenzadeh, H. (2013). Rhetorical Move Structure of Literature Book Prefaces in English and Persian. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n4p317
Nkemleke, D. A. (2006). Nativization of dissertation acknowledgements and private letters in Cameroon. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 166–184.
Samraj, B. (2002). Disciplinary variation in abstracts. The case of wildlife behaviour and conservation biology. In Flowerdew (Ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Sekyi-Baidoo, Y. (2003). Learning and Communicating (2nd ed.). Accra: Infinity Graphics.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research Settings.
Swales, J. M. (1988). Discourse communities, genres and English as an international language. World Englishes, 7(2), 211–220.
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (2010). Towards a taxonomy of the preface in English, French, and German. Neohelicon, 37(1), 75–90.
Waddingham, A. (2014). The New Hart’s Rules the Oxford Style Guide. Oxford University Press.
Yang, W. (2013). Genre analysis of dissertation acknowledgements: A comparative study across contexts. Yang, W. (2013). Genre Analysis of Dissertation Acknowledgements: A Comparative Study across Contexts. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(2), 27–40.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking.; Learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers and Education, 59(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
Zappen, J. P. (1989). The Discourse Community in Scientific and Technical Communication. Institutional and Social Views. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/H6FN-3MKT-QAB2-TAN6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning the right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Scopus Profile
Google Scholar
