Exploring Indonesian Lecturers' Perceptions and Practices on English Language Assessment

Imam Munandar*    -  Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia
Shaumiwaty Shaumiwaty  -  Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Takengon, Aceh Tengah, Aceh, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Assessments are crucial in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL), impacting students' knowledge acquisition and influencing teachers' beliefs and training. The present research investigates lecturers' fundamental conceptions regarding assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) and their instructional practices in higher education. Twelve English department EFL lecturers participated in a study using purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires. The research used a thematic analysis methodology to identify themes, classifications, and subcategories reflecting respondents' perspectives on EFL evaluation. The study's results showed that the subjects used diverse terminology to illustrate evaluation, offering a stimulating context for their respective methodologies. Furthermore, the participants believed that language assessment serves multiple purposes, including administrative and educational functions. Most respondents viewed evaluation as a continuation of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom instruction and acquisition, significantly influencing students' educational outcomes and learning strategies. Therefore, considering how assessments can improve student learning will likely influence educators' working in EFL assessment. Research highlights the need for professional development for lecturers to improve their understanding of language assessment and practice through workshops, training sessions, and resources.

Keywords: language assessment; Indonesian; EFL; lecturer's belief; lecturer's practice

  1. Archbald, D. A. (1991). Authentic assessment: Principles, practices, and issues. School Psychology Quarterly, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088821
  2. Azis, A. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions and use of assessment in student learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i1.72
  3. Azis, A. (2015). Conception and practice of assessment: a case of Teachers representing improvement conception. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/129-154
  4. Bartholomaeus, P. (2010). What Teachers Need to Know about Teaching Methods [Book Review]. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 18(1).
  5. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
  6. Cheng, L. (2015). Introduction to language cassroom assessment. Language Classroom Assessment, 1.
  7. Cockerill, M., Craig, N., & Thurston, A. (2018). Teacher perceptions of the impact of peer learning in their classrooms: Using social interdependence theory as a model for data analysis and presentation. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27
  8. Doolittle, A. E. (2002). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know (Second Edition). Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01136.x
  9. Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539
  10. Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs in English Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p78
  11. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science Halmstad University, Sweden.
  12. Hill, K. (2015). Integrating Instruction, Curricula, and Assessments in the L2 Classroom. Tesl-Ej, 19(2).
  13. Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: principles, practices, and problems. In Language Testing in Asia (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z
  14. Macey, M., Salaway, J., & Bagnato, S. J. (2013). Authentic assessment practice guide: Ten big ideas for implementing authentic assessments. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
  15. Momeni, A., & Nushi, M. (2022). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Dynamic Assessment: Does Context Make a Difference? Language Related Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.13.3.15
  16. Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Alamdar, P. (2021). The role of dialogic interaction in EFL writing assessment: A sociocultural perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31754
  17. Muñoz, A. P., & Palacio, M. (2012). Teachers ’ Beliefs About Assessment in an EFL Context in Colombia. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 14(1).
  18. Nazari, A. (2017). Dynamic Assessment in Higher Education English Language Classes: A Lecturer Perspective. In The Journal of Language Teaching and LearningTM (Vol. 7, Issue 7).
  19. Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. G. A. L. P., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Needs Analysis of Literacy Assessment Using Blended Learning for Beginner EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.27
  20. Puad, L. M. A. Z., & Ashton, K. (2021). Teachers’ views on classroom-based assessment: an exploratory study at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1761775
  21. Saad, M. R. B. M., Sardareh, S. A., & Ambarwati, E. K. (2013). Iranian secondary school EFL teachers’ assessment beliefs and roles. Life Science Journal, 10(3).
  22. Shohamy, E., Ofra, I.-L., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Investigating Assessment Perceptions and Practices in the Advanced Foreign Language Classroom.
  23. Stiggins, B. R. J., & Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10).
  24. Suwartono, T., & Riyani, C. (2019). Authentic assessment in ELT: hopes, challenges, and practices. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v9i2.2865
  25. Wahyuni, L. G. E., Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Paramartha, A. A. G. Y. (2021). Authentic Assessment Practice. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 540. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.258
  26. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007
  27. Zaim, M., Refnaldi, & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for english secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Imam Munandar, Shaumiwaty Shaumiwaty
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

    

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Publisher
English Education Department,
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training,
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof Hamka Ngaliyan Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

apps