Ecological Affordances and the Spontaneous Emergence of English in a Bilingual EFL Primary School

Bungsudi Bungsudi; Eka Pratiwi Yunianti; Teofilo Boguite Damoco

doi:10.21580/vjv15i231989

Authors

Bungsudi Bungsudi Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8432-7417
Eka Pratiwi Yunianti Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu, Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6865-5225
Teofilo Boguite Damoco Union Christian College, San Fernando City, La Union, Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2267-595X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv15i231989

Keywords:

ecological affordances, spontaneous language emergence, bilingual EFL primary school, young learners, ecological language learning

Abstract

Early English acquisition in EFL contexts is often reduced to formal instructional outcomes, overlooking the role of naturalistic, ecological processes in children's language development. This study examines how ecological affordances shape the spontaneous emergence of English among young learners in a bilingual primary school in Indonesia. Using a qualitative phenomenological case study design, data were collected through participatory observations, in-depth interviews with students, teachers, and parents, and document analysis. The findings reveal that English development is not primarily driven by formal instruction but emerges through dynamic interactions across digital, social, physical, and affective environments. Four key affordance layers were identified: digital exposure as the initial trigger, family mediation as reinforcement, school-based interaction as functional stabilization, and affective affordances as motivational sustainers. This study further advances three interrelated theoretical constructs that model language emergence as a multi-layered, self-reinforcing ecological system operating recursively across home, school, and digital spaces. These findings reconceptualize early language learning as a distributed and interaction-driven phenomenon. The study implies that educators and policymakers should prioritize designing affordance-rich learning environments that bridge home, school, and digital spaces to sustain meaningful English use in EFL primary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Affordances theory in multilingualism studies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3

Astutik, A., & Suryanto, B. T. (2024). Children's English language acquisition in an Indonesian family: Perspectives from language policy. Premise Journal of English Education, 13(2), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i2.9170

Baroody, A. J., Purpura, D. J., Eiland, M. D., & Reid, E. E. (2015). The impact of highly and minimally guided discovery instruction on promoting the learning of reasoning strategies for basic add-1 and doubles combinations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30(Part A), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.09.003

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071r6

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2022). Pedagogical translanguaging and its application to language classes. RELC Journal, 53(2), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221082751

Chandra, J., Djuan, D., & Shieren, R. (2023). Digital media to improve children's English pronunciation: A case study. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Education, 1(1), 58–63. https://smarteducenter.org/index.php/Loquela/index

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Finders, J., Wilson, E., & Duncan, R. (2023). Early childhood education language environments: considerations for research and practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202819

Ford, A. L. B., Elmquist, M., Merbler, A. M., Kriese, A., Will, K. K., & McConnell, S. R. (2020). Toward an ecobehavioral model of early language development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.004

Jing, M., Ye, T., Kirkorian, H. L., & Mares, M.-L. (2023). Screen media exposure and young children's vocabulary learning and development: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 94(5), 1398–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13927

Jun, H. R., & Mu, B. (2024). An ecological perspective on agency: L2 learners' sociopragmatic interpretations and strategies in a study abroad context. Languages, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9050174

Justice, L. M., Jiang, H., & Strasser, K. (2018). Linguistic environment of preschool classrooms: What dimensions support children's language growth? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.003

Kasbi, S., & Shirvan, M. E. (2017). Ecological understanding of foreign language speaking anxiety: Emerging patterns and dynamic systems. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0026-y

Koivula, M., Palojärvi, A., Moate, J., & Mård-Miettinen, K. (2024). Creating early language education affordances in two pre-primary education classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 13(1), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.58955/jecer.129612

Kramsch, C. J. (2003). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. Continuum.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.2

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001

Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59. https://apples.journal.fi/article/view/97838

Moustakas, C. (2011). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

Mulyani, P. K. (2022). The effect of parental absence on children's literacy development: A case study of a fourth-grade elementary school student. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 11(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv12i116052

Muslem, A., Fata, I. A., & Saputri, W. I. (2022). The effect of English authentic YouTube videos on students' speaking skills in rural schools. Journal of Education Technology, 6(3), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i3.45412

Ollerhead, S., & Pennington, G. (2024). Starting small: Engaging young learners with literacy through multilingual storytelling. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984241303390

Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 50(4), 793–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000708

Prošic-Santovac, D., & Rixon, S. (2019). Integrating assessment into early language learning and teaching. Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/doi:10.21832/9781788924825

Purnamasari, A. (2018). What EFL learners say about YouTube use to improve pronunciation in a blended learning environment. Journal of English Teaching, 4(3), 205–215. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1314960.pdf

Rahimi, M. (2024). Learning ecology perspective of instructors to enhance EFL students' speaking skills: A microsystem perspective of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 12(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv13i118058

Rowe, L. (2018). Say it in your language: Supporting translanguaging in multilingual classes. The Reading Teacher, 72. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1673

Rowe, M. L. (2022). Environmental influences on early language and literacy development: Social policy and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 63, 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.04.001

Schwartz, M., & Deeb, I. (2021). Toward a better understanding of the language conducive context: an ecological perspective on children's progress in the second language in bilingual preschool. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1484424

Setyaningrum, R. W., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2022). Translanguaging as a scaffolded practice in a primary school content and language integrated learning context during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 3043–2055. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2043

Sun, P. P. (2023). The influence of cognitive, affective, and sociocultural individual differences on L2 Chinese speech performance: a multiple indicators multiple causes approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(1), 217–239.

Tai, K. W. H. (2022). Translanguaging as inclusive pedagogical practices in English-medium instruction science and mathematics classrooms for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 975–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10018-6

Thi, N. A., Tra, N. H., My, N. H., Thuy, P. T., Thao, L. T., Yen, P. H., & Thu, H. T. A. (2022). Empowering Vietnamese EFL learners at tertiary level: Investigating factors shaping learner autonomy in English language acquisition. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 11(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv12i116406

Unsworth, S., Brouwer, S., De Bree, E., & Verhagen, J. (2019). Predicting bilingual preschoolers' patterns of language development: Degree of non-native input matters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1189–1219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000225

Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Yang, N., Shi, J., Lu, J., & Huang, Y. (2021). Language development in early childhood: Quality of teacher-child interaction and children's receptive vocabulary competency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(July), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649680

Zein, M. S. (2016). Elementary English education in Indonesia: Policy developments, current practices, and future prospects. Cambridge University Press, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078416000407

Zhao, Y., Lu, J., Woodcock, S., & Ren, Y. (2022). Social media Web 2.0 tools adoption in language and literacy development in early years: A scoping review. Children, 9(12), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121901