Religious Teachers' Views on The Caliphate Concept In The Learning Context

Ahmad Muthohar*  -  Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
The discourse on re-establishing the caliphate as a constitutional system has generated controversy. Such controversy has also penetrated the education context, including Islamic education. The research results indicated that the religious teachers' understanding of the caliphate has various thoughts. This difference will affect the learning method and students' understanding. In general, this variety of understanding can be categorized into three groups. First, the semi-group supports the caliphate, believing it will be established if each citizen improves their understanding of monotheism. The second is a neutral group. They stated that the implementation of the caliphate system had been practiced by socio-religious organizations in Indonesia, such as Nahdlatul Ulama or Muhammadiyah. The third is the counter group on the caliphate. This group views Indonesia as a country that can be interpreted as the incarnation of a caliphate with a democratic system; the president is also considered a caliph. These three groups of teachers with different understandings of the caliphate will affect students' understanding. If they are not straightened out, it will endanger the existence of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia as an established nation.

Keywords: Controversy, Caliphate, Religious Teachers

  1. Al-Buthy, M. S. R. (1993). Fiqh Jihad. Pustaka An-Nabaa’.
  2. Al-Maududi, A. A. (1965). Islamic Way of Life Dacca: Islamic Publication, East Pakistan. Islamic Publication, East Pakistan.
  3. Al-Nabhani, T. (1996). Nidham al-Hukm fi al-Islam. Dar al-Umah.
  4. Al-Rais, D. (1985). Al-Islam wa al-Khilafah fi al-‘Ashr al-Hadits.
  5. Ar-Raziq, A. A. (1985). Khilafah dan Pemerintahan dalam Islam, Terj. Afif Muhammad. Pustaka.
  6. Arifin, Z. (2019). Khilafah dalam Islam. Al-Idaroh: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1). https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/alidarah/article/view/4802
  7. Arifudin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Profesionalitas Guru Terhadap Perkembangan Potensi Belajar Siswa Dalam Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Di Madrasah Aliyah Al-Ikhlas Ujung Pendidikan Islam. Al-Qiyamah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(1). https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/alqayyimah/article/view/786
  8. Asmani, J. M. (2009). 7 Kompetensi Guru Menyenangkan dan Profesional. Power Book (IHDINA).
  9. Asrin, A., Fitria, H., & Eddy, S. (2021). The Effect of Teacher Competence and the School Environment on Student Achievement of SD Negeri Kecamatan Jirak Jaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3). https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1754
  10. Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D., & Morlino, L. (2011). International Encyclopedia of Political Science (1st ed.). SAGE.
  11. Hayati, N., & Pahlevi, T. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru dan Fasilitas Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar melalui Motivasi Belajar. Journal of Office Administration : Education and Practice, 2(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v2n2.p79-95
  12. Hidayat, K. (2014). Kontroversi Khilafah Islam, Negara, dan Pancasila. Mizan.
  13. Ibnu Khaldun, A. bin M. (1998). Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldûn. (2nd ed.). Dar al-Fikr.
  14. Iswandi, I., Amran, M., & DH, S. (2021). Hubungan Antara Kompetensi Profesional Guru Dengan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus II Kecamatan Tanete Riattang Kabupaten Bone. Autentik : Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.36379/autentik.v5i2.136
  15. Kassab, E. S. (2010). Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural Critique in Comparative Perspective. Columbia University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/kass14488
  16. KMA 183 of 2019 and KMA 184 of 2019. (n.d.).
  17. Law No. 19/2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. (n.d.).
  18. M. Yatimin, A. (2006). Studi Islam Kontemporer. Sinar Grafika Offset.
  19. McQuaid, J. (2014). Reviving the Caliphate: Fad,or the Future? CNA. https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/cop-2014-u-008247-1rev.pdf
  20. Moh. Mahfud MD. (2017). Menolak Ide Khilafah. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/05/26/15370351/menolak.ide.khilafah?lgn_method=google
  21. Mujib, A. (2006). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Kencana.
  22. Muthohar, A. (2008). Pendekatan Klarifikasi Nilai dalam Penanaman Nilai-nilai Agama. Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1).
  23. Nasution, H. (1998). Tradisi Baru Penelitian Agama Islam Tinjauan Antardisiplin Ilmu. Purjalit dan Nuansa.
  24. Nugroho, P. (2021). Persepsi Guru Agama Terhadap Penghapusan Materi Ajar Khilafah Dalam Buku PAI (Studi Terhadap Guru PAI Di kab. Kudus jawa tengah). https://simlitbangdiklat.kemenag.go.id/simlitbang/spdata/upload/policy_brief/1615275387POLICY_BRIEF_PUSPO_NUGROHO.pdf
  25. Putrawan, B. K., & Eunike, P. (2021). Islamic Radicalism: History and a Case Study in the Indonesia Context. Jurnal Theologia, 32(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2021.32.1.7906
  26. Rasyid, M. (2016). Gagal Paham Khilafah. Pustaka Compass.
  27. Siregar, S. (2018). Khilafah Islam dalam Perspektif Sejarah Pemikiran Ali Abdul Raziq. JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam), 2(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.30829/j.v2i1.1794
  28. Sykiainen, L. (2017). The Islamic Concept of Caliphate: Basic Principles and a Contemporary Interpretation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2918685
  29. Watt, W. M. (2003). Islam and the Integration of Society. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Islam-and-the-Integration-of-Society/Watt-Watt/p/book/9780415605557

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 INDEXED BY

Journal Terindex di CrossrefJournal Terindex di LeidenJournal Terindex di MorarefJournal Terindex di Google ScholarJournal Terindex di GarudaJournal Terindex di Base

View My Stats
apps