Critical Pedagogy in an EFL Context: Towards Solving the Definition Precision Problem

Leila Akbarpour*    -  Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran, Islamic Republic of

(*) Corresponding Author

Some critics mention the definition variety problem, or a lack of definitional precision, as a major problem with Critical Pedagogy (CP). One who has just been familiar with CP may not have enough information regarding its roots and its multidisciplinary nature. S/he may not know about the historical development of CP and thus may not even be acquainted with the possibility of the existence of different definitions and versions for CP. Therefore, a newly-arrived researcher may get confused encountering the different definitions of CP. On the other hand, the literature on CP does not seem to be directed at the new researchers. By having five phases, the present mixed-methods study offered a simple definition of CP encompassing all the common grounds in the literature using an extensive literature review, the Grounded Theory approach, and Factor Analysis. Ten Iranian EFL professionals in CP, besides 306 Iranian EFL teachers, participated in the present work. The results of the present work may be helpful in developing CP-based curricula and courses which look into the real needs of the learners and teachers in order to have a more fruitful educational system.

Keywords: critical pedagogy; critical pedagogy definition; EFL; English language teaching

  1. Abednia, A. (2010). In-service Language Teacher Education in Iran: The Status Quo and The Transformative Contributions to Teachers’ Social Identity Construction. University of Allameh Tabatabai, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Akbarpour, L. & Sahragard, R. (2016). Pedagogy of Possibility in Practice: Principles, Course Development, and Application. . . Applied Research on English Language, 4(2), 1–24.
  3. Apple, M. (1982). Education and Power.
  4. Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and curriculum (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  5. Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum (2nd editio). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  6. B, F. (2004). Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing : The paradox of Critical Pedagogy. The Journal of Radical Pedagogy, 6.
  7. Bahrami, A. (2014). Why a Critical Pedagogy? What is Critical Pedagogy? www.ensani.ir
  8. Breuing, M. (2011). Problematizing Critical Pedagogy. . . International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 2–23.
  9. Breuing, Mary. (2011a). Problematizing Critical Pedagogy | Breuing | The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3). http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/view/246
  10. Breuing, Mary. (2011b). Problematizing Critical Pedagogy. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 2–23. http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/view/246
  11. Canagarajah, A. S., & Press, O. U. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. OUP Oxford. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8RQ%5C_v9GoHsYC
  12. Cox, P. . . A.-P. (1999). Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. In Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly.
  13. Dewey, J. (1916). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Democracy and Education.
  14. E. Eisner. (2002). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. Macmilan New York.
  15. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA Research and Language Teaching. OUP Oxford. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=3vA8SQAACAAJ
  16. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London Penguin.
  17. Freire, Paulo. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York : Continuum.
  18. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
  19. Glenn, C. . (2002). Critical Rhetoric and Pedagogy: (Re)Considering Student-Centered Dialog. The Journal of Radical Pedagogy, 4. http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue4_1/02_Glenn.html
  20. Greene, M. (2007). Art and Imagination: Overcoming a Desperate Stasis. In A. C. Ornstein, E. F. Pajak & S. B. Ornstein (Eds.). In Contemporary issues in curriculum.
  21. Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1998). Toward A Non-Repressive Critical Pedagogy. Educational Theory, 48(4), 462–486.
  22. Hollstein, M. S. (2006). Critical Pedagogy: Preservice Teachers ‘Perspectives. University of Ohio.
  23. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
  24. Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Routledge.
  25. Kanpol, B. (1999). Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction. In Greenwood Publishing Group: USA.
  26. Kellner, D. (2000). Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogies. In P. Pericles Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary Pedagogies: Cultural Politics, Instituting Education, and the Discourse of Theory. New York: Routledge.
  27. Kessing-Styles, L. (2003). The Relationship between Critical Pedagogy and Assessment in Teacher Education. The Journal of Radical Pedagogy, 5(1). http://www.radicalpedagogy.icaap.org.
  28. Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Critical Pedagogy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  29. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  30. Lather, P. (1991). Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
  31. Lather, P. (2001). Feminist Engagements: Reading, Resisting, and Revisioning Male Theorists in Education and Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 183–196.
  32. Mayes, P. (2010). The Discursive Construction of Identity and Power in the Critical Classroom: Implications for Applied Critical Theories. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 189–210.
  33. McLaren, P. (2003). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundation of Education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  34. Messner, M., Medina-Messner, V., & Guidry, J. (2016). Global health and social media: using Instagram and Twitter in an open online class for global service-learning projects. Communication Teacher, 30(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2016.1219042
  35. Mezirow, J., & A. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  36. Mjoset, L. (2005). Can Grounded Theory Solve the Problems of its Critics? Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 134, 379–408.
  37. Ngugi, W. T. (1993). Moving the Center: The Struggle for Cultural Freedoms. New York, NY: Heineman.
  38. Oakes, J. (1995). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  39. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM Statistics (5th Ed.). London: Open University Press.
  40. Pennycook, A. (1989). The Concept of “Method,”Interested Knowledge, and the Politics of Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589–618.
  41. Pennycook, A. (1995). English in the World/the World in English. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and Inequality in Language Education (pp. 34–58). Cambridge University Press.
  42. Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical Approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329–348.
  43. Pillow, W. (2000). Exposed Methodology: The Body as a Deconstructive Practice. In E. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the Ruins: Feminist Poststructural Theory and Methods in Education. New York: Routledge., 199–219.
  44. Pishghadam, R. & Naji Meidani, E. (2012). A Critical Look into Critical Pedagogy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10(2), 464–484.
  45. Ross, E. W. (2007). Critical Pedagogy. In S. Mathison & E. W. Ross (Eds.), Battleground Schools. Greenwood Press: London.
  46. Shabani, M. B. & Khorsandi, M. (2014). An Investigation into the Role of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Critical Pedagogical Views in Their Educational Success. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 144–153.
  47. Shor, I. (1996). When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  48. Shrewsbury, C. M. (1987). (1987). What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly. 15(3), 6–14.
  49. Smith, K. (2013). Covert Critique: Critical Pedagogy “Under the Radar” in a Suburban Middle School. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 4(2), 127–146.
  50. Stinson, D.W., Bidwell, C.R. & Powell, G. C. (2012). Critical Pedagogy and Teaching Mathematics for Social Justice. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 4(1), 76–94.
  51. Suddaby, R. (2006). What Grounded Theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.
  52. Thelin, W. H. (2006). Thelin’s Response to Russel Durst. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 1114–1118.
  53. Thomson-Bunn, H. (2014). Are They Empowered Yet? Opening up efDinitions of Critical Pedagogy. Composition Forum,. http://compositionforum.com/issue/29/
  54. Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education. London &New York: Routledge.
  55. Weiler, K. (Ed. ). (2001). Feminist Engagements: Reading, Resisting, and Revisioning Male Theorists in Education and Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
  56. Yilmaz, K. (2009). Elementary School Teachers’ Views About the Critical Pedagogy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 139–149.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Leila Akbarpour
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

    

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Publisher
English Education Department,
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training,
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof Hamka Ngaliyan Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

apps