Students’ Perspective on Teaching Materials of English for Management Business II In Management Department, Universitas Muria Kudus

Nuraeningsih Nuraeningsih


In the era of globalization, people around the world can have interaction for satisfying their goal in any aspect of life, such as business, politics, social and culture, education, etc. for that reason, the need of English proficiency as a global language becomes a priority. Therefore, it is compulsory for all students in formal education to learn it.   In university level, students of the non-English department must study English with varied purposes, depending on their major, at least for two credits. Generally, it is taught to support the basic major or discipline. Consequently, the materials are designed based on their needs, especially later when they get jobs. For this reason, the material adapted is called ESP (English for Specific Purposes) which aims at preparing students to meet the demands of the workplace, i.e. the English skills. It should be more contextual, real life for now and the future. If the material is authentic and in accordance with the needs of learners, they will likely be ready to work as the demands of the employer. With these objectives, the English materials need to be adjusted to the needs of users (stakeholders) so that after graduating from universities, freshmen can directly work or create jobs according to their expertise. This research aims to describe students’ perception of English teaching materials for Management department. A survey was conducted to second-semester students of Management department of Universitas Muria Kudus. The result of the study reveals that the students have a positive perspective on the teaching materials of English for Management Business II. They think affirmatively that the materials have been selected properly in terms of material attraction, usefulness, authenticity, variety, level of difficulty, language skill proportion and the discussed topics. In other words, the materials are appropriate for satisfying Management department students’ need to prepare their future. The implication is the materials should be revised by adding more reading texts of Business English and providing more vocabulary tasks in the real context.


teaching material, English for Management Business II

Full Text:



A. Waters, T. H. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: a LearningCentered-Approach.Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Algadrie, L. (2002). Needs Analysis: Strategic Issue on the Teaching of English for Specific Purposes for the Study of Sciences and Technology. TEFLIN Journal, 13(1), 106–112.

Alina, B.-T., & Lavinia, N. (2018). The Advantages of Authentic Materials in the ESP/EFL Classroom: Newspaper. “Ovidius” University Cannals, Economics and Sciences Series, XVIII(I).

Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Alzyadi, M. S. (2015). Using Material Authenticity in the Saudi English Textbook Design: A Content Analysis from the Viewpoint of EFL Teachers. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 229–241.

Dubin, F., & Olshtein, E. (2000). Course Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Esmer, E., Güven, G., Aydın, O., Özden, B., Efe, K., & Şener, N. (2016). Perception of Education Faculty Students on Teaching Method & Materials. Academic Journals, 11(12), 1093–1109.

Farani, Y. (2017). ESP Business English: The Proposed Students’ Workbook Used for Teaching Bahasa Inggris Bisnis at D3 Accounting of Economics & Bussiness Faculty at UNMER Malang. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 2(1), 61–71.

Hungkyo, J., & Kijay, J. (2009). The effect of Integrated and Segregated Skills Approach on English Language Acquisition among Freshmen Nursing & Business Students in Mission College Thailand. The Scriptor, Journal of Arts & Humanities Department Thailand.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purpose. An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.

Khoshhal, Y. (2018). The Role of Teaching Materials in the ESP Course: A Case of Business English (Finance and Economics). Journal of Humanistic and Social Studies, IX(1).

Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic Materials and Cultural Content in EFL Classrooms. The Internet TESL Journals, X(7).

Liau, H. C., & Chen, Y. S. (2012). English for Science and Technology Teahing Materials: One Phase Evaluation. IETC Conference. Taoyuan: National Central University, Taiwan.

Spirovska Tevdovska, E. (2016). Authentic Material vs Textbooks in ESP (English for Specific Purposes). Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 5(1).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by


Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning

To improve the quality of the journal, since 25 July 2020, this journal officially had made cooperation with ELITE Association Indonesia (The Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature & Education). See The MoU Manuscript.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats